Why Automated Testing is Important – Part 2

Posted in: Software Development, Craftsmanship, Software Development, Development Processes, Software Development, Quality Assurance & Control, Software Development

In Part 1 of this series I described the characteristics that make up a good Automated Test. Here in Part 2 of this series I will explore all of the benefits you will enjoy by creating those good tests and why the time spent on making good tests is a no-brainer investment.
Continue reading »

Why Automated Testing is Important – Part 1

Posted in: Software Development, Craftsmanship, Software Development, Development Processes, Software Development, Quality Assurance & Control, Software Development

The of strategies and tools, both in Agile and traditional , has been patchy – some and communities have embraced it, but many organizations still perceive it as a burden that just slows down development. Those that see the writing and execution of tests as an additional, costly and separate task from development have missed seeing some of the main benefits of an expertly manicured .
Continue reading »

Bad Code, Craftsmanship, Engineering, and Certification

Posted in: Software Development, Craftsmanship, Software Development, Development Processes, Software Development, Leadership, Software Development, Quality Assurance & Control, Software Development

Robert C. Martin, during his keynote at QCon London 2010, tried to figure out why there is so much bad code written. He offers advice on writing good code talking about a bad code example, Boy Scout rule, functions, arguments, craftsmanship, TDD, continuous integration, pairing, small cycles, patterns, engineering, certification, and other elements contributing to qualitative code.

http://www.infoq.com/presentations/Robert-C.-Martin-Bad-Code

Ward Cunningham on Technical Debt

Posted in: Software Development, Craftsmanship, Software Development, Development Processes, Software Development, Quality Assurance & Control

In this video Ward reflects on the origins of the term Technical Debt and how it has been misused and misunderstood over the years.

Scrum Anti-pattern: Outlier Pigs

Posted in: Software Development, Development Processes

In the Pig and Chicken analogy for Scrum participants (Jeff Sutherland explains Pigs & Chickens), the Pig is the one who is required to make the biggest commitment and put his proverbial skin in the game. For the Pig, it is an all or nothing proposition. They either meet their commitment or they do not, there is no gray area. However, many fail to get this level of commitment from their Pigs, or don’t even ask for it in the first place. This is the genesis of the Outlier Pig.
Continue reading »

Scrum Anti-pattern : Prioritizing Stories Within Sprints

Posted in: Software Development, Development Processes, Effecting Change, Software Development, Leadership, Software Development

The prioritization of Stories is a core practice in the Scrum agile development process. In fact it is probably the single most important responsibility of the Product Owner – making sure the Product Backlog is prioritized properly to maximize value (a.k.a ROI). However, there is a common anti-pattern that I see regularly in which the Product Owner and the act complicitly to establish a priority order for Stories that are being committed too within a single Sprint. The need to do this comes from a negative place and it has dramatic consequences for the .
Continue reading »

Microsoft Hates Testing … Um, No Surprise There

Posted in: Software Development, Craftsmanship, Software Development, Development Processes, Software Development, Quality Assurance & Control, Reviews

A colleague of mine forwarded an article to me during this last week, which he prefaced with the following statement …

guys, I’ll write it in all caps and bold:

I AM NOT PROMOTING OR IN AGREEMENT OF ANY OF THE POINTS THE ARTICLE MAKES.

… which begs the question, why did he send it not only to me, but an entire team of people? I choose to believe it was because he is an enlightened soul that understands that the best way to reinforce your own beliefs is to read more of the opposing point of view, not more of the view you already have. I am lucky to have a few of these souls working for me right now.
Continue reading »

SoCal Code Camp Los Angeles II

Posted in: Software Development, Craftsmanship, Software Development, Development Processes, Software Development, Training

SoCal Code Camp is back, November 21st & 22nd

Code Camp is a place for developers to come and learn from their peers. This community driven event has become an international trend where peer groups of all platforms, programming languages and disciplines band together to bring content to the community.

Who is speaking at Code Camp? YOU are, YOUR PEERS are, and YOUR LOCAL EXPERTS are…all are welcome! This is a community event and one of the main purposes of the event is to have local community members step up and offer some cool presentations!

Is LinkedIn ready to recognize O.C.?

Posted in: Software Development, Development Processes, Quotes

Bill Crane, the vice president of engineering at LinkedIn, says local members of the social networking site may haveorange-prize Orange County as a geographic designation for members’ profiles within two weeks.

http://jan.freedomblogging.com/2009/09/16/linkedin-working-on-oc-geographic-designation/22015/

Quote of the Week

Posted in: Software Development, Development Processes, Quotes

Another purpose of measuring capacity is to improve throughput. If you plan for less than your capacity, you get less done than you could have. If you plan for more than your capacity, you get less done than you could have.

- Kent Beck
(original signatory of the Agile Manifesto)